Search results

Last time I tried that (with LSAPI 6.3) I didn't get any erros, nor did I do anything special other than replace the LSAPI 5.5 files and compile with the --with-litespeed option. What errors are you getting ?

Could it be related to this ? http://cpanelstuffs.linuxcabin.com/?p=1089

Hello, We're impatient to install v4.2.5, has anyone made the jump ? any feedback how stable it is ? Thanks !

Litespeed is best with either the suexec deamon mode or the suexec worker group mode (if you have enough memory). These are the most secure and fastest solutions.

Thanks, Is this only usible with Apache httpd.conf ? Could a user who doesn't have Apache on his server still use this ?

I will don't worry, but the server has got 256 GB memory so I should be able to share quite a bit before swapping :) I was thinking about allowing 128MB per account which over 800 accounts would be a maximum of 100GB. I'm also guessing that I will be able to not have any instances running on...

No, not yet, will it be the next release ? You can see it bein annonced for version 5.0 here : http://www.litespeedtech.com/products/litespeed-web-server/features If you concider the huge new features introducted between 4.2.4 in version 4.2.5 our hopes are up very high now for 5.0...

Are there any non google benchmarks to say what difference this makes ?

They say it is planned for version 5 of litespeed :)

I'm going to have to think hard about that one as 4.2.5 seems to solve all of mine in one go ! :)

It's the new lsphp that isn't that easy to downgrade on Cpanel box (takes time to recompile php). As the server I want to run it on has quite a few important production sites I'll wait a couple of weeks. I'm very impatient to try this out as this new version answers every feature I wanted !

Sounds like 4.2.5 has just solved this whole issue with the new suexec per account ! Very exciting, can't wait to give this a try !

Well it seems this is no longer needed as 4.5 ! Thank's ! Will try an update in a few weeks.

Sounds like this should be fixed in 4.2.5 ! Very Nice news. I will however wait for this new version to be concidered stable before updating. But I'm extremly pleased with the new features !

Hello, Will 4.2.5 also prevent litespeed from actually opening the file to get it's size an printing it to the access logs ? I believe this file size is counted towards the users bandwidth in cPaneland while the 403 error manages to get the bandwidth down to 3 bytes per call the RewriteRule...

Great, thanks :)

With : RewriteRule .* - [E=blockbot:1,F] I'm still getting success codes (200) I also tried inversing it : RewriteRule .* - [F,E=blockbot:1] When I get a success code the server opens the users file as it gives the filesize whereas with a 403 error it gives the size of the error message.

How would I combine it ? Like this ? RewriteRule .* - [E=blockbot:1,F] Or maybe like this ? RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla\/4(.*)$ RewriteRule .* - [E=blockbot:1] RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla\/4(.*)$ RewriteRule .* - [F,L]

I've just tested and with this setting requests are getting through. It seems the first time they get through then the next times they are blocked, however it's never the same IP's so it doesn't seem to be helping. With : RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla\/4(.*)$ RewriteRule .* -...

Hello, We are looking into building a working ruleset for mod security. We tested gotroot ruleset (paid version) but it evolved too quickly for litespeed and caused lots of problems so we gave up with it at that time. I now wanted to try and implement a rule at a time and try and work...